2012年6月12日 星期二

RS485 serial information

RS232RS422RS423 and RS485 are serial communication methods for computers and devices. RS232 is without doubt the best known interface, because this serial interface is implemented on almost all computers available today. But some of the other interfaces are certainly interesting because they can be used in situations whereRS232 is not appropriate. We will concentrate on the RS485interface here.


RS232 is an interface to connect one DTEdata terminal equipment to one DCEdata communication equipment at a maximum speed of 20 kbps with a maximum cable length of 50 feet. This was sufficient in the old days where almost all computer equipment were connected using modems, but soon after people started to look for interfaces capable of one or more of the following:
  • Connect DTE's directly without the need of modems
  • Connect several DTE's in a network structure
  • Ability to communicate over longer distances
  • Ability to communicate at faster communication rates
RS485 is the most versatile communication standard in the standard series defined by the EIA, as it performs well on all four points. That is why RS485 is currently a widely used communication interface in data acquisition and control applications where multiple nodes communicate with each other.

Differential signals with RS485:
Longer distances and higher bit rates

One of the main problems with RS232 is the lack of immunity for noise on the signal lines. The transmitter and receiver compare the voltages of the data- and handshake lines with one common zero line. Shifts in the ground level can have disastrous effects. Therefore the trigger level of the RS232 interface is set relatively high at ±3 Volt. Noise is easily picked up and limits both the maximum distance and communication speed. With RS485 on the contrary there is no such thing as a common zero as a signal reference. Several volts difference in the ground level of the RS485 transmitter and receiver does not cause any problems. The RS485 signals are floating and each signal is transmitted over a Sig+ line and a Sig- line. The RS485 receiver compares the voltage difference between both lines, instead of the absolute voltage level on a signal line. This works well and prevents the existence of ground loops, a common source of communication problems. The best results are achieved if the Sig+ and Sig- lines are twisted. The image below explains why.

Noise in straight and twisted pair cables
Noise in straight and twisted pair cables

In the picture above, noise is generated by magnetic fields from the environment. The picture shows the magnetic field lines and the noise current in the RS485 data lines that is the result of that magnetic field. In the straight cable, all noise current is flowing in the same direction, practically generating a looping current just like in an ordinary transformer. When the cable is twisted, we see that in some parts of the signal lines the direction of the noise current is the oposite from the current in other parts of the cable. Because of this, the resulting noise current is many factors lower than with an ordinary straight cable. Shielding—which is a common method to prevent noise in RS232 lines—tries to keep hostile magnetic fields away from the signal lines. Twisted pairs in RS485 communication however adds immunity which is a much better way to fight noise. The magnetic fields are allowed to pass, but do no harm. If high noise immunity is needed, often a combination of twisting and shielding is used as for example in STPshielded twisted pair and FTPfoiled twisted pair networking cables. Differential signals and twisting allows RS485 to communicate over much longer communication distances than achievable with RS232. With RS485 communication distances of 1200 m are possible.

Differential signal lines also allow higher bit rates than possible with non-differential connections. 
Therefore RS485 can overcome the practical communication speed limit of RS232. Currently RS485 drivers are produced that can achieve a bit rate of 35 mbps.

Characteristics of RS485 compared to RS232, RS422 and RS423

Characteristics of RS232, RS422, RS423 and RS485
RS232RS423RS422RS485
Differentialnonoyesyes
Max number of drivers
Max number of receivers
1
1
1
10
1
10
32
32
Modes of operationhalf duplex
full duplex
half duplex
half duplex
half duplex
Network topologypoint-to-pointmultidropmultidropmultipoint
Max distance (acc. standard)15 m1200 m1200 m1200 m
Max speed at 12 m
Max speed at 1200 m
20 kbs
(1 kbs)
100 kbs
1 kbs
10 Mbs
100 kbs
35 Mbs
100 kbs
Max slew(扭轉) rate30 V/μsadjustablen/an/a
Receiver input resistance3..7 kΩ≧ 4 kΩ≧ 4 kΩ≧ 12 kΩ
Driver load impedance3..7 kΩ≧ 450 Ω100 Ω54 Ω
Receiver input sensitivity±3 V±200 mV±200 mV±200 mV
Receiver input range±15 V±12 V±10 V–7..12 V
Max driver output voltage±25 V±6 V±6 V–7..12 V
Min driver output voltage (with load)±5 V±3.6 V±2.0 V±1.5 V
What does all the information in this table tell us? First of all we see that the speed of the differential interfaces RS422and RS485 is far superior to the single ended versions RS232 and RS423. We also see that there is a maximum slew rate defined for both RS232 and RS423. This has been done to avoid reflections of signals. The maximum slew rate also limits the maximum communication speed on the line. For both other interfaces—RS422 and RS485—the slew rate is indefinite. To avoid reflections on longer cables it is necessary to use appropriate termination resitors.
We also see that the maximum allowed voltage levels for all interfaces are in the same range, but that the signal level is lower for the faster interfaces. Because of this RS485 and the others can be used in situations with a severe ground level shift of several volts, where at the same time high bit rates are possible because the transition between logical 0and logical 1 is only a few hundred millivolts.
Interesting is, that RS232 is the only interface capable of full duplex communication. This is, because on the other interfaces the communication channel is shared by multiple receivers and—in the case of RS485—by multiple senders.RS232 has a separate communication line for transmitting and receiving which—with a well written protocol—allows higher effective data rates at the same bit rate than the other interfaces. The request and acknowledge data needed in most protocols does not consume bandwidth on the primary data channel of RS232.

Network topology with RS485

Network topology is probably the reason why RS485 is now the favorite of the four mentioned interfaces in data acquisition and control applications. RS485 is the only of the interfaces capable of internetworking multiple transmitters and receivers in the same network. When using the default RS485 receivers with an input resistance of 12 kΩ it is possible to connect 32 devices to the network. Currently available high-resistance RS485 inputs allow this number to be expanded to 256. RS485 repeaters are also available which make it possible to increase the number of nodes to several thousands, spanning multiple kilometers. And that with an interface which does not require intelligent network hardware: the implementation on the software side is not much more difficult than with RS232. It is the reason why RS485 is so popular with computers, PLCs, micro controllers and intelligent sensors in scientific and technical applications.

RS485 network topology
RS485 network topology
In the picture above, the general network topology of RS485 is shown. N nodes are connected in a multipoint RS485network. For higher speeds and longer lines, the termination resistances are necessary on both ends of the line to eliminate reflections. Use 100 Ω resistors on both ends. The RS485 network must be designed as one line with multiple drops, not as a star. Although total cable length maybe shorter in a star configuration, adequate termination is not possible anymore and signal quality may degrade significantly.

RS485 functionality

And now the most important question, how does RS485 function in practice? Default, all the senders on the RS485 bus are in tri-state with high impedance. In most higher level protocols, one of the nodes is defined as a master which sends queries or commands over the RS485 bus. All other nodes receive these data. Depending of the information in the sent data, zero or more nodes on the line respond to the master. In this situation, bandwidth can be used for almost 100%. There are other implementations of RS485 networks where every node can start a data session on its own. This is comparable with the way ethernet networks function. Because there is a chance of data collosion with this implementation, theory tells us that in this case only 37% of the bandwidth will be effectively used. With such an implementation of a RS485 network it is necessary that there is error detection implemented in the higher level protocol to detect the data corruption and resend the information at a later time.
There is no need for the senders to explicity turn the RS485 driver on or off. RS485 drivers automatically return to their high impedance tri-state within a few microseconds after the data has been sent. Therefore it is not needed to have delays between the data packets on the RS485 bus.
RS485 is used as the electrical layer for many well known interface standards, including Profibus and Modbus. ThereforeRS485 will be in use for many years in the future.

The Difference Between CIF And 4CIF Resolution

The Difference Between CIF And 4CIF Resolution

4CIF Resolution Image
When configuring your DVR for optimal recording, there are many options you will be considering. Among them is the resolution you want to record in. While most DVR’s can record in CIF resolution (360×240) at the maximum frame rate provided by the DVR, some can also record at higher resolutions by reducing the frame rate. For example, you may be able to record on any channel at CIF resolution at 30 frames per second, but then you would probably only be able to record at 7.5 fps per second if you changed the resolution to 4CIF (704×480). (解析度增加四倍, fps少75%)You will have to decide for each camera (assuming your DVR has independent resolution settings for each channel) which resolution you want to record in. Remember, what you see is not always what you get! Most DVR’s will display live video in 4CIF or D1 (720×480) resolution, but they are often recording in a much lower resolution.

Each application has different needs. If you are using the security camera for a general overview, you may want to use CIF resolution and the maximum frame rate since detail is less important and fluid video is probably more important. On the other hand, if you are using the camera for facial recognition at the front door of your business, then you will surely want to record at 4CIF resolution, even if it means sacrificing some of the frame rate. The 4CIF image is literally 4 times larger than the CIF image and therefore can provide you with 4 times the detail. There are a couple of DVRs out there that can give you the best of both worlds, 4CIF resolution while doing 30fps recording on every channel. At this time, I only know of one unit that can offer that. It is the Ultimate Series DVR.
Here are 2 different images taken from an Elite Series DVR. The smaller image was from a CIF (360×240) recording and the larger image is from a 4CIF (704×480) recording. The difference between the two is the size of the image stored on the hard drive.
CIF Resolution
CIF Resolution Image
4 CIF Resolution
4CIF Resolution Image
As you can see, the 4CIF image is much larger. It will be much easier to capture details from the 4 CIF resolution image, than from the CIF resolution image. Unless you are lucky enough to be working with a DVR that does 4CIF or D1 recording in real time (30fps) on all channels at the same time, you will need to decide for each camera, which resolution is best for that application.


資料來源:http://www.securitycameraking.com/securityinfo/2009/08/the-difference-between-cif-and-4cif-resolution/

960H, D1, CIF


3MP is 2048 x 1536 pixels

1080p (FHD) is 1920 x 1080 pixels (16:9)

2MP is 1600 x 1200 pixels

HD+    1600x900 (16:9)
HD      1366x768 (16:9)

1.3MP is 1280 x 1024 pixels
1MP is 1280 x 960 pixels (4:3)

720p is 1280 x 720 pixels (16:9)

'960H' is the name given to a series of CCD image sensors developed by the Sony Corporation in 2009. These CCD image sensors are capable of capturing video images at a resolution of 976h x 528v.

WD1 is 960x480 pixels

    D1 is 720x480 pixels
    4CIF is 704x480 pixels

VGA is 640 x 480 pixels

    DCIF is 528x320 pixels
    2CIF is 704x240 pixels

Half D1: This is an MPEG-2 stream where it only has half the horizontal resolution
This would be 352x480 (NTSC) (兩倍CIF) and 352x576 (PAL)

    CIF is 352x240 pixels
    QCIF is 176x120 pixels
Xcif_graphic
















自動增益控制 AGC


AGC(Automatic Gain Control)是自动增益控制电路,用于保持放大器输出信号幅度大体恒定的电路系统。使放大电路的增益自动地随信号强度而调整的自动控制方法。
在放大电路中,不论输入信号的幅度波动情况如何。整流器对交流输出信号取样并送出一个与输出信号幅度成比例的直流信号。经过滤波的直流信号和平滑的输出电压作为偏压以正确的极性加到前一级或前几级放大电路,以减小其增益。放大器输入信号越强,增益减小的就越大,结果小信号放大增益高,大信号放大增益小,使得输出信号幅度维持在一定范围内。这种方案的各种形式被用于多种放大器和通信系统中。




資料來源:http://www.dianziaihaozhe.com/jichuyujingyan/1910/

2012年6月11日 星期一

PAL vs NTSC

There has been endless debate on the relative merits of the quality of PAL images versus the quality of NTSC images. In this article, I want to present you with the arguments for and against both PAL and NTSC on DVD so that you can make an informed decision when purchasing your DVDs in regards to the best version to buy. As you will see in this article, it is not necessarily the case that PAL is always better or that NTSC is always better. However, I aim to point out the reasons why you should prefer one format over the other, and in which circumstances you should prefer one format over the other.
    As an aside, if you are not familiar with the concept of 16x9 enhancement, I strongly recommend that you read my article on this topic, as your understanding of the remainder of this article will be significantly enhanced if you understand 16x9 enhancement.
    As a further aside, if you have a Region 1 DVD player you in all likelihood cannot play PAL DVDs both for reasons of Region locking and because the great majority of Region 1 DVD players have had their PAL playback ability disabled, not to mention the fact that most NTSC display devices cannot display PAL images.

They're Not Really PAL or NTSC

    The first thing I need to clarify about DVD is that PAL and NTSC are words and formats that are applied to DVD for convenience, and because of historical convention. There is nothing fundamental about a DVD which makes it either PAL or NTSC, but for simplicity and brevity, I will continue to use these terms throughout this article.    At their heart, DVDs are merely carriers of data files with compressed audio-visual information contained therein. This information can be placed on DVD in one of two resolutions; 720 x 576 pixels (PAL DVDs), or 720 x 480 pixels (NTSC DVDs), and with various frame rates (24, 25, and 30 frames per second are common). The DVD player itself takes this data file and formats it appropriately for display in either PAL or NTSC.

The Issue Of Resolution

    In principle, PAL DVDs have a compelling advantage over NTSC DVDs. PAL DVDs have 576 pixels of vertical resolution versus 480 pixels of vertical resolution. That's a 20% increase in resolution for a PAL DVD as compared to an NTSC DVD. Increased resolution translates into a better looking image. However, this is an overly simplistic way of looking at the whole PAL vs NTSC issue as there are other factors that need to be taken into account.

Active Pixels & 16x9 Enhancement

    Because programming can be presented on DVD in various aspect ratios, it is useful to consider the active pixels in a given image when considering the overall resolution of a DVD. For a widescreen image, not all of the pixels available on a DVD are actually used for the image. Some of them make up the black bars above and below the image. The format that provides the most overall active pixels for a given aspect ratio will in theory be the best possible format. Complicating the issue is the difference in active pixels when a DVD is 16x9 enhanced.    The following table illustrates the common aspect ratios presented on DVD along with the total active pixels presented in each possible DVD format. I have highlighted the best formats in green.

Aspect Ratio




4x3 PAL





16x9 enhanced PAL





4x3 NTSC





16x9 enhanced NTSC
1.33:1




720 x 576 = 414,720





538 x 576 = 309,888





720 x 480 = 345,600





538 x 480 = 258,240
1.66:1




720 x 461 = 331,920





671 x 576 = 386,496





720 x 384 = 276,480





671 x 480 = 322,080
1.78:1




720 x 430 = 309,600





720 x 576 = 414,720





720 x 358 = 257,760





720 x 480 = 345,600
1.85:1




720 x 414 = 298,080





720 x 554 = 398,880





720 x 345 = 248,400





720 x 461 = 331,920
2.35:1




720 x 326 = 234,720





720 x 436 = 313,920





720 x 271 = 195,120





720 x 363 = 261,360







Key




Best





Second Best





Third Best





Worst

Widescreen Movies

    For widescreen movies, 16x9 enhanced PAL DVDs provide the highest resolution image, and are theoretically the version of choice. If the PAL version of a widescreen movie is not 16x9 enhanced, then the version of choice is a 16x9 enhanced NTSC DVD.

Frame and Field Rates

    The consideration of which version is best is complicated by the issue of source material. In the case of movies, the choice is simple - pick the disc which has the highest possible image resolution, all else being equal. In the case of video-sourced material, the choice is less simple.
Movies
    Movies the world over are shown at a frame rate of 24 frames per second. That is, 24 images are projected onto the cinema screen every second. Movie film is a very high resolution format, far higher in resolution than the DVD format. Accordingly, the movie itself is not the limiting factor in deciding between PAL and NTSC format DVDs, as the same source material is usually used to create both the PAL and the NTSC versions of a particular DVD. Therefore, the limiting factor in resolution is the DVD itself, with PAL inherently higher in resolution than NTSC.
Video
    With video-based source material, there are two predominant worldwide formats; PAL and NTSC, which differ in both resolution and in frame rate. PAL is higher in resolution (576 horizontal lines) than NTSC (480 horizontal lines), but NTSC updates the on-screen image more frequently than PAL (30 times per second versus 25 times per second). What does this mean in practice? NTSC video is lower in resolution than PAL video, but because the screen updates more frequently, motion is rendered better in NTSC video than it is in PAL video. There is less jerkiness visible. When video source material is transferred to DVD, it is usually transferred in the format it was created in - PAL or NTSC, and the subsequent image has either higher temporal resolution (more frames per second - NTSC) or higherspatial resolution (more lines per image - PAL).    Conversions between the two video formats are possible, and  are indeed frequently carried out, as it seems to be far more acceptable to sell PAL transfers in PAL countries and NTSC transfers in NTSC countries, even if the source material did not originate in the respective format. Conversions between these formats is problematic, however, as compromises need to be made in order to accommodate the source material, and visible artefacts can be introduced by the conversion process.

Converting NTSC to PAL
    When converting from NTSC to PAL, two things need to be accomplished. 480 lines of resolution have to be upconverted to 576 lines of resolution, and 30 images per second have to be downconverted to 25 images per second.    The resolution upconversion does not actually add any real picture information to the image, as you cannot create real picture information where none existed before. It does, however, make the picture viewable on a PAL display, and often results in a superficially better-looking image.
    The frame rate conversion actually results in a loss of temporal resolution, as PAL has a lower frame rate than NTSC.
Converting PAL to NTSC
    The converse situation applies to PAL to NTSC conversions. 576 lines of resolution are downconverted to 480 lines of resolution, and frames need to be inserted to go from the 25 frames per second of PAL to the 30 frames per second of NTSC. Once again, the resultant image is of less actual resolution than the original image, as information is discarded spatially and made up temporally.

Implications for Video Programming On DVD
    The best format to record and play back video programming on DVD in is the format in which the programming was originally created. If it was videotaped in the NTSC format, then the NTSC DVD will be the version of choice. If it was videotaped in the PAL format, then the PAL DVD will be the version of choice.
Higher Definition Source Material
    Complicating this issue is the fact that more and more programming is being created in higher definition video formats these days, and these high definition formats can usually be converted down to PAL or NTSC equally well, with both formats having their respective disadvantages.
So, Which Version Do I Choose?
    As a general rule, video programming sourced from PAL-based countries is likely to look better in PAL, and video programming sourced from NTSC-based countries is likely to look better in NTSC, since these are the likely native formats that they have been created in.

Other Factors To Consider

    If all of the above issues aren't enough to consider when deciding whether to purchase a PAL or an NTSC version of a particular title, there are several other factors which are also worth taking into consideration.
Compression Ratio
    Previously, it has been established that a PAL DVD has 20% more resolution than an NTSC DVD. This does not necessarily translate into a superior image. The DVD format relies on a lossy video compression format (MPEG-2) to allow a reasonable length of programming to fit onto a single DVD. The longer the programming, the higher the compression ratio needs to be, and the more likely it is that visible compression artefacts will be present. If an additional 20% of resolution needs to be compressed, then this can potentially result in a lesser quality image if the programming is overcompressed. Fortunately, many PAL DVDs are being produced as dual layer discs, whereas their NTSC counterparts are being produced as single layer discs, thus providing the necessary room for both versions to look their best.
Censorship
    There are times when programming can be censored for display in PAL countries and uncensored in NTSC countries. GoldenEye and Tomorrow Never Dies are specific examples of DVDs where the PAL versions of the DVDs have been censored in comparison to the uncensored NTSC versions. The converse also sometimes applies, as is the case with Eyes Wide Shut, the DVD of which was digitally censored in the USA but uncensored in Australia.    It is exceedingly difficult to find out whether a specific DVD has been censored in one part of the world or another. Two specific Internet resources that are helpful in this area are;
  • The Internet Movie Database, at http://www.imdb.com. This lists cuts and alternate edits to specific movies under the Alternate Versions subheading, and
  • Melon Farmers, at http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/dhhits.htm. This is predominately a listing of UK cuts to DVDs, which is generally not applicable to the Australian version of the DVD. However, on occasion we receive the same disc as the UK, and subsequently suffer the same censorship.
  • The Cut List, at http://www.dvdfile.com/software/cut_list/index.html. This is a listing of US cuts and alternate DVD edits.
PAL's 4% Speed Up
    Movies on PAL DVDs play back 4% faster than their NTSC counterparts. The great majority of people will never notice this, but for a small minority, this is an intolerable artefact. For more details on why this speed-up occurs, please refer to my article on this topic.
NTSC's 3:2 Pulldown
    Movies on NTSC DVDs play back at the correct speed, but they achieve this by utilizing a process called "3:2 pull-down". A detailed discussion of this process is beyond the scope of this article, but the net effect of this is that any image pan is not smooth, but takes place in a series of uneven steps, an artefact known as judder. As with PAL's 4% speed-up, the great majority of people will never notice this artefact, but for a small minority, this is intolerable. Personally, I find this artefact all but intolerable and find it very hard to watch a movie on an NTSC DVD because of it.
Extras
    Often times, the extras on one version of a DVD are not found on another version. It is most disconcerting when you have purchased a DVD to find out that another version is available which has far more extras than the one that you have just paid good money for.
Remastering
    Sometimes, a DVD will be produced from restored or remastered source elements in one region and from non-restored sources in another region.

Conclusions

  • PAL is a higher resolution format for DVD than NTSC. All else being equal, a PAL DVD of a movie should look significantly better than the equivalent NTSC DVD.
  • If a PAL version of a movie DVD is not 16x9 enhanced and the NTSC version is 16x9 enhanced, then the NTSC version will be the preferred version, all else being equal.
  • For video-based material, it is generally better for the DVD to remain in the same format as the source material.
  • Do your homework before purchasing a DVD! Check as many resources as you can in order to determine which version of a particular DVD is the most appropriate one to purchase.
資料來源:http://www.michaeldvd.com.au/articles/palvsntsc/palvsntsc.asp

NTSC is used with a fps of 60i or 30p, so theoretically offers very slightly smoother motion than PAL, which is generally used with 50i or 25p.

Progressive scanning (alternatively referred to as noninterlaced scanning) is a way of displaying, storing, or transmitting moving images in which all the lines of each frame are drawn in sequence. This is in contrast to interlaced video used in traditional analog television systems where only the odd lines, then the even lines of each frame (each image called a video field) are drawn alternately. (p-逐行掃描/播放, i-隔行掃描/撥放)

以NTSC電視機為例, 在工作的時候, 把衣幅525行圖像分成兩場來掃, 第一場稱奇數場, 掃描奇數行, 而第二場掃描偶數行, 透過兩場掃描完成原來一圖像掃描的行數

PAL broadcast systems

This table illustrates the differences:
PAL BPAL G, HPAL IPAL D/KPAL MPAL N
Transmission BandVHFUHFUHF/VHF*VHF/UHFVHF/UHFVHF/UHF
Fields505050506050
Lines625625625625525 = NTSC625
Active lines576576582**576480 = NTSC576
Channel Bandwidth7 MHz8 MHz8 MHz8 MHz6 MHz6 MHz
Video Bandwidth5.0 MHz5.0 MHz5.5 MHz6.0 MHz4.2 MHz4.2 MHz
Colour Subcarrier4.43361875 MHz4.43361875 MHz4.43361875 MHz4.43361875 MHz3.575611 MHz3.58205625 MHz
Sound Carrier5.5 MHz5.5 MHz6.0 MHz6.5 MHz4.5 MHz4.5 MHz

The Internet Movie Database

http://www.imdb.com/

 美國不錯的影評網站

DVD 區域碼

數位影碟區域碼限制DVD region code),俗稱DVD區域碼,即最主要就是保障每個地區的影音產品經銷商與代理商的權益,而專為DVD-Video所制定出的「限定在某區域內才能正常使用」的區域碼限制,用以杜絕產品平行輸入的問題,避免某區域未上映的電影票房收入因為其DVD-Video的流通而造成損失。



DVD區域碼限制
區域號碼區域限制
0非正式術語,意思是「全世界」。0區碼不是官方設置標誌,0區碼的光碟沒有設置標誌,而1-6區碼的光碟設有設置標誌。
1加拿大美國百慕達美國管轄地區
2歐洲俄羅斯白俄羅斯烏克蘭除外)、中東(僅傳統中東地區)、南非史瓦濟蘭賴索托格陵蘭日本法國海外領地(例如法屬蓋亞那
3香港澳門臺灣韓國東南亞
4墨西哥中美洲南美洲法屬蓋亞那除外)、加勒比地區波多黎各除外)、大洋洲新喀里多尼亞除外)
5俄羅斯白俄羅斯烏克蘭非洲埃及南非史瓦濟蘭賴索托除外)、中亞南高加索國家、南亞阿富汗蒙古北韓
6中國大陸
7預留
8國際管轄地區,例如飛機客輪內。
ALL全區碼,是任何區碼(即1-6區碼選擇其中一個)的DVD播放機可播放光碟。
資料來源:http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/DVD%E5%8D%80%E5%9F%9F%E7%A2%BC

我的網誌清單